Skip to main content

The Role of Women: Part 1


One of the biggest downsides to being raised within a religion was being a girl. From a very young age I recognized that boys and girls were treated differently, and to my four year old mind, the most obvious evidence of this was in the way we were expected to dress. I was expected to wear a dress or skirt with a nice blouse, clothing of which I loathed, especially when accompanied by tights and headbands. I thought I was very clever at one point when I discovered the skort, which is a pair of shorts with a wrap around it to make the shorts appear as a skirt. I wore that thing every Sunday until I outgrew it. Boys could wear trousers, the occasion nice pair of shorts, and a pressed shirt. They weren’t really expected to wear ties until they turned 12.
                
As I grew older, I began to recognize the differences in our church activities from those of my guy friends (i.e. Achievement Days versus Scouts) and in the subject matter of our lessons (i.e. “What traits do you want your husband to have” versus The Power of the Priesthood), not to mention our budgets. Most of this I’ve already touched on in previous posts, but another thing that I slowly began to realize as my spiritual journey continued to unfold, was the very distinct differences in our perceived roles in the home.
                
My church activities revolved around learning how to cook, to clean, to be obedient to the Lord and the Priesthood, to be a peacemaker, to keep a journal, to gain knowledge of spiritual things, to remain chaste, to serve others; in essence, I was learning the importance of motherhood. The boys were learning about the power of the Priesthood and how to survive in the wilderness, an admirable trait in a father, I’m sure, once the zombie apocalypse is upon us. For years I harbored ill feelings toward the Church and its leaders because of these differences, but for the most part I kept quiet, because to question Priesthood authority is to bring about your own excommunication; a frightening prospect for a young woman.
                
On those rare occasions when I did voice my opinion and say something as naïve as “It’s just not fair”, I would get a subtle lecture on how the role of a woman (more specifically, the role of a mother) is the most important role of humankind and that Church leaders don’t expect women to only be mothers, but to receive an education as well. Each of these lectures was, and remains, laughable, especially now that I’m able to take my self-inflicted blinders off as I read through doctrine and talks from church leaders.
                 
I believe that the main reason why the Church finally came out and said that women should be educated is because the rest of Western society had been promoting the notion for years. The Mormons always seem to be the last to the table. The best part about this declaration for women to become educated, though, is how the Church twists it to their needs. Women should be educated so that they can be more involved in their children’s education. Since they are supposed to be the most dominant parent in a child’s life, they need to be able to steer a child away from ideas that clash with church doctrine. A woman being educated was a “revelation” that further ties women to the home.
                
I, in no way, would ever belittle the role of a woman in the home. My mother was a stay at home mom, and for the most part she enjoyed it. At times though, she questions her life as a mother and it pains me to hear her mention articles that circulate on Facebook or in the news that demean women who choose to stay at home with their children rather than pursue a career. I try to point out to her that every person is made differently. Every woman has a different need that will make her feel satisfied and fulfilled as a woman. For some, that’s a career where they compete head to head with the boys. For others, their children are what fulfill them. For a time she seems satisfied, but eventually something else will surface and we have the same basic conversation all over again.

I blame religion, in large part, for this conflict. I cannot speak for other religions, but the Mormon religion in particular does not teach that women can or should be different from each other. Every woman should aspire to be a mother. To want something like a full time career in place of children is shirking ones divine role and basically telling God that his plan is not good enough for them.  There can only be an in between, that of the full-time mother part-time worker, if finances don’t allow for the mother to stay at home full-time.

I do have a lot more to say on this subject, but for now I just want to provide a handful of quotes from Conference talks, given mostly by Priesthood holders, on the important role of women. They range from the late 1970’s to 2013, the purpose being to show that no matter what headway the Church claims to have made as far as women are concerned their basic message remains the same: Women belong in the home.
***
“Young women should plan and prepare for marriage and the bearing and rearing of children. It is your divine right and the avenue to the greatest and most supreme happiness.” – Spencer W. Kimball: October 1978 General Conference; Privileges and Responsibilities of Sisters
                “The work of women is essential in the kingdom, whether as wife, mother, sister or all three.” –Barbara B. Smith: October 1978 General Conference; Women’s Greatest Challenge
                “Since the beginning, a woman’s first and most important role has been ushering into mortality spirit sons and daughters of our Father in Heaven. Since the beginning, her role has been to teach her children eternal gospel principles. She is to provide for her children a haven of security and love-regardless of how modest her circumstances might be. In the beginning, Adam was instructed to earn the bread by the sweat of his brow- not Eve. Contrary to conventional wisdom, a mother’s place is in the home!
                “It is a misguided idea that a woman should leave the home, where there is a husband and children, to prepare educationally and financially for an unforeseen eventuality.” – Ezra Taft Benson: October 1981 General Conference; The Honored Place of Woman
               
“Some years ago President Benson delivered a message to the women of the Church. He encouraged them to leave their employment and give their individual time to their children. I sustain the position which he took.  Nevertheless, I recognize, as he recognized, that there are some women…who have to work to provide for the needs of their families. To you I say, do the very best you can. I hope that if you are employed full-time you are doing it to ensure that basic needs are met and not simply to indulge a taste for an elaborate home, fancy cars, and other luxuries. The greatest job that any mother will ever do will be in nurturing, teaching, lifting, encouraging and rearing her children in righteousness and truth. None other can adequately take her place.” – Gordon B. Hinckley: October 1996 General Conference; Women of the Church
                “Women of God can never be like women of the world. The world has enough women who are tough; we need women who are tender. There are enough women who are coarse; we need women who are kind. There are enough women who are rude; we need women who are refined. We have enough women of fame and fortune; we need more women of faith. We have enough greed; we need more goodness. We have enough vanity; we need more virtue. We have enough popularity; we need more purity.” – Margaret D. Nadauld: October 2000 General Conference; The Joy of Womanhood
                “But the basic element which should never change in the lives of righteous young women is giving service to others. Their divine role as caregivers helps noble womanhood gain ‘the highest place of honor in human life’. Serving others can begin at almost any age. Often the greatest service to others in one-on-one. It need not be on a grand scale, and it is noblest within the family.”
                In reference to the goals of the YW program: “These goals…should include education and skill training. A young mother whom I love recently told a group of young women that the goals should coincide with the joys of womanhood. But, she said, the goals should not be so rigid and fixed that you do not listen to the whisperings of the Spirit. Keep your hearts and minds open to know the overriding will of the Lord in your lives.” – James E. Faust: April 2000 General Conference; Womanhood: The Highest Place of Honor

                “…some will try to persuade you that because you are not ordained to the priesthood you have been shortchanged… they do not understand the gospel of Jesus Christ. The blessings of the priesthood are available to every righteous man and woman.”
                “…the Church cannot achieve the full measure of its creation unless both faithful men who bear the priesthood and righteous women who rejoice in serving under the direction of the priesthood work together.” – Sheri Dew: October 2001 General Conference; It is not Good for Man or Woman to be Alone

                “A pernicious philosophy that undermines women’s moral influence is the devaluation of marriage and of motherhood and homemaking as a career. Some view homemaking with outright contempt, arguing it demeans women and that the relentless demands of raising children are a form of exploitation….We do not diminish the value of what women or men achieve in any worthy endeavor or career-we all benefit from those achievements-but we still recognize there is not a higher good that motherhood and fatherhood in marriage…Whatever else a woman may accomplish, her moral influence is no more optimally employed that here.” – D. Todd Christofferson: October 2013 General Conference; The Moral Force of Women




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In Response to Mr. Greg Trimble

(Apologies for another long post) In a perusal of my Facebook news feed, I stumbled across a lovely article that a neighbor of my parents shared entitled “So…You Think the Book of Mormon is a Fraud” . Mr. Trimble, who authored this lovely article, uses the typical Mormon circular reasoning that states that if the Book of Mormon is true, then Joseph Smith was a prophet; and if Joseph Smith was a prophet, then the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is the same Church that Christ established while he was on Earth. So in the Mormon mind, it all comes down to whether the BOM is true or not, and for this, they rely on warm fuzzy feelings to confirm that the Book is in fact, true. Mr. Trimble states that he noticed that most of the people who criticize the Book of Mormon the loudest, have not actually read it. While this may be true, I don’t think a person needs to read a book fully to understand whether it’s true or not. That’s what research is for. Reading the Book of Morm

The War in Heaven; Part 2

                I suggest that the extreme horribleness of hell, as portrayed by priests and nuns, is inflated to compensate for its implausibility. If hell were plausible, it would only have to be moderately unpleasant in order to deter. Given that it is so unlikely to be true, it has to be advertised as very scar indeed, to balance its implausibility and retain some deterrence value.                                 Richard Dawkins, God Delusion, pg. 361  I began the first part of this post because of a comment on Facebook and the article that it linked to. I was frustrated by both because they contradict the doctrine I was taught throughout my relation with the Church and they blatantly ignore that it was the same for every member up to the publishing of this article. Not only this, but they make it sound as though the members who believe that we had a choice in heaven between Satan and Jesus (almost every single member) misinterpreted these lessons, and they are the ones at fau

I'm Not a Fan of Matt Walsh: Part 2

Matt Walsh is an Idiot: Why “Yes, Gay Marriage Hurts Me Personally” is not effective. I am a glutton for punishment where Matt Walsh is concerned. He is a pompous ass, and reading his articles makes my blood boil, and not just because he writes for Glen Beck’s network and we don’t share the same opinions. Bottom line is that he is not a great writer. If he were to turn one of his articles into any of my University English professors, he would not have fared well. Even my 11 th grade English teacher would have ripped him a new one. Why: Because he cannot write an argumentative paper. Not a single one of his articles I have read has contained any semblance of argumentation. He likes to say things like, first and second, as if he’s actually introducing solid reasons to support his opinion, but they end up being wordy and condescending with an overabundance of analogies that don’t actually provide support. The article listed in the title of my post is one of Walsh’s more recent